Meryl’s missing press release

Meryl Dorey, of the anti-vaccination pressure group the Australian Vaccination Network, sent out two press releases yesterday. One was posted to Facebook (briefly, before it was deleted when someone asked the AVN a question) and Twitter. That press release has been investigated by Dan Buzzard, here. Further analysis of the press release was conducted on Diluted Thinking, here. Here is the post on Twitter, which Dorey forgot to delete:

On Twitter, you can ignore uncomfortable questions

On Twitter, you can ignore uncomfortable questions

It takes courage and nuance to declare community members, who have done nothing wrong, and committed no crime, to be a “hate group” and “attackers”, in a press release.

What happened to the second press release? It wasn’t shared on Facebook and Twitter with the usual flurry of a Viagra spammer. Maybe it had something to do with the content.

Being the brave and courageous person I know myself to be, with my commitment to the cause, knowing full well the danger inherent in possessing such bravery and courage, I thought it my duty to share the second press release to Facebook and Twitter. This is one small step for me; one giant leap for more people like me.

Saying sorry like The Fonz

Saying sorry like The Fonz

Here is the full release. The chivalrous full release:

Mea Culpa         

This morning, a newsletter was sent out in error by myself, Meryl Dorey, regarding the procedural unfairnesswhich both I and the Australian Vaccination Network have been subject to over the last 4 plus years. This newsletter was drafted on the 22nd of February and concerned the large number of investigations by government departments which the AVN has had to endure since winning our court case against the Health Care Complaints Commission (HCCC) last year.

Though every word of this newsletter was correct and true, it should not have been issued. I had written the newsletter and sent it to the committee for discussion and approval. After consulting with our legal advisor, we realised there were two different Acts at play here, and that meant the situation was not as clear as we originally thought. The Incorporaed Associations Act does not have provision for suppression of the names of committee members – even if there is a real and valid threat against them should their names be made public. Therefore, we decided to not send the document out and instead, our committee made the very brave and difficult decision to provide their names to the Department of Fair Trading.

Unfortunately, in order to share this document with the committee, I had to schedule it for distribution and had chosen the arbitrary date of March the 1st, thinking that when it had been edited, the scheduling would be changed and it would be sent in its new form. When the committee decided not to send this message because it was pointless to try and oppose the regulations requiring that their identities be released, I forgot to go back into our newsletter program to delete the scheduling. As a result, the newsletter was sent out this morning.

I accept full responsibility for this error – it was mine and mine alone.

Just as I accept full responsibility for making this mistake, I do want you all to know that the AVN National Committee has accepted full responsibility for their commitment to the issue of protecting the health rights of all Australians and ensuring that information which is of interest to consumers, concerning vaccination will always be available.

Our committee members decided to reveal their names to the Department of Fair Trading – the only other option would have been to allow the Department to fine us out of existence, leaving Australia without a national body for support on this vital issue.

The committee names were sent yesterday and our committee is painfully aware that providing this information can and most likely will see them, their families and their businesses or employers subject to the same sort of harassment, intimidation and threats that I have endured for the last four and a half years.

Please have a think about what sort of strength and courage that takes on their part – much more than it took for me because I was not subject to these threats for the first 15 years of running the AVN – I honestly don’t know if I would have become involved had I known about this in advance.

So, though I am sorry that this newsletter was sent out in error, I am happy to have had an opportunity to tell you about our committee who have displayed courage and commitment far above the call of duty – simply because they believe so strongly in justice and equity for all Australians and the freedom to make our own health choices and to speak about them without any fear of discrimination, penalty or threats.

Please join me in saluting this brave group of Australians who I am so proud to be associated with as I am so proud of all of you – the members of the Australian Vaccination Network. May we be allowed to help protect you for as long as our help is needed.

Yours in health,

Meryl Dorey

For the Committee Members of the anti-vaccination pressure group, the Australian Vaccination Network:

__________________________________

And, for those of us with the courage and bravery to use this mighty internet to its almightiest power:

Share them like a boss

Share them like a boss

 

 

Advertisements

About reasonable hank

I'm reasonable, mostly.
This entry was posted in anti-vaccination dishonesty, australian vaccination network, AVN, meryl dorey, stop the australian vaccination network and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Meryl’s missing press release

  1. Tracey says:

    What an arrogant woman. Indeed, contrary to her inaccurate belief otherwise, theirs is not the only anti vaccination organisation in this country, so even if the AAVN closed down today their anti vaccination cause would continue almost unabated. Indeed, what has the AVN contributed to the anti vaccination conspiracy theory anyway? A bit of agitation on facebook, and the forwarding of work that others have done.

    Apart from the irritation of their personal attacks on families that have lost children to vaccine preventable diseases and an unwavering hatred of the SAAVN members the AAVN has offered nothing, and added nothing to the issue of vaccination or anti vaccination.

    They will not be missed.

  2. G Thompson says:

    Let me get this straight.
    1. The AVN a legal incorporated body which comes under the auspices of ASIC due to its incorporated nature (and not NSW Dep. of Fair Trading in this respect) which allegedly it seems now has at its helm a Mr Greg Beattie (President) after the ex President Ms Meryl Dorey allegedly stepped down.
    2. The same ex president Ms Dorey released a press release on two separate occasions, one of which (the latter) was to apologise and mitigate any confusion caused by the earlier one.
    3. This dispute, when you get to the actual crux, is over their unwillingness to answer public questions that must under the appropriate legislative Act be answered, due to their acceptance of becoming an Incorporated body, of whom is a member of their executive committee, when they became a member, their role, and their basic address information – the same information that EVERY incorporated body has to supply whomever they are under Australian Corporation.

    My question is this: How does someone who is the EX president have the ability to release without authorisation from the executive committee) , according to the latter press release, the first press release and then also have the authority to release the second press release as well with their OWN name on it and not the name of the organisation they are supposedly representing.

    Could it be that Ms Dorey has been less than truthful in her statements of stepping down as the true power behind the AVN and if the articles of incorporation that the AVN has now sent ‘allegedly’ to the appropriate body do not reflect her as the True power behind the committee (aka: President or in actuality there is no real committee just a rubber stamp) then would this be a fraudulent act under not just Corporation law but other let us say interesting Criminal Codes and/or Tax laws?

    Time will tell I suspect, time will tell.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s